—
a post my mum shared on fb earlier (via mnrva)
Written by the poet Michael Rosen
(via coldalbion)
YES YES YES
Facism almost always walks in and offers two things:
1) identification of a legitimate problem (often poverty/a failing economy/a lack of jobs)
2) identification of an Other who can be blamed and removed so that the problem is solved and the future is prosperous and safe. (The Other almost never caused the problem, but that’s not the point; the point is how you can tell the story to link them together.) The idea of the Other being to blame is often softened, at first: “Well, we’re not talking about ALL [group], just the bad ones!” Just punishments for the “bad” people, and you and your friends and family get your future back.
It’s a deal an awful lot of people will take, if they are brought to believe in it.
(via decepticonsensual)
I’d argue though, that actually the Other is NEVER the
problem, and that that is precisely the point: fascism intentionally misidentifies
the source of the problem so that the problem can never be truly solved,
because in order to survive and thrive, fascism relies on the citizens living in a state of perennial insecurity and fear.
I’d also argue that the “friendly” facade of fascism usually
coexists with very explicit declarations of fascism’s true intent: fascists DO
say things like “our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations,
war and persecution” out loud. But a lot of people are all too willing to focus
on the promises of protection, employment, honor restored, and pretend they
didn’t hear that last part, or if they acknowledge it, they justify it by
saying well, but of course we don’t mean ALL Others, only the “bad” ones! And
then, weirdly enough, it always turns out that the vast majority of the Others
are “bad”.
(via fearlessinger)