Icon by @ThatSpookyAgent. Call me Tir or Julian. 37. He/They. Queer. Twitter: @tirlaeyn. ao3: tirlaeyn. BlueSky: tirlaeyn. 18+ Only. Star Trek. The X-Files. Sandman. IwtV. OMFD. Definitionless in this Strict Atmosphere.

gahsofluffy:

alexisandstuff:

fuerte-como-un-molcajete:

dynastylnoire:

cosmic-noir:

Okay so I’m really excited about this!

The dream of finding a nude underwear that isn’t terrible may finally be at my very fingertips!

They’re adorable and pretty affordable, selling at $18-$22.

Check them out at www.naja.co

(Shout out to Catalina Girald & Gina Rodriguez!)

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

YES

Will never not add this commentary when I see folks post about Naja.

Support them!! They are one of the few fashion brands with a commitment not to use sweatshop labor.

In fact, the people who make their bras and panties are women! They are often single moms or heads of their household. Naja offers free assistance for education and day care for the children of the women working for them. Conversely, Victoria’s Secret used prison labor for many years. Now, they likely contract with a sweatshop or other unsafe factory facilities.

Support Naja! So they can continue to support WOC in more ways than one!

@gayadhdpoe

Am planning to watch the debate tonight. (Sometimes my curiosity wins out over self-preservation.) But I will laugh so much if Trump doesn’t even show up. I hope they still let Hillary answer the questions.

citrusella-flugpucker:

tirlaeyn:

Legal Side of Tumblr: Is the GOP allowed to switch out their nominee at the last minute?

((My breadth of legal knowledge is limited to disability law as it applies to education (class I had to take as a preservice deaf ed teacher), but:

https://ballotpedia.org/State_laws_and_party_rules_on_replacing_a_presidential_nominee

“The GOP has no mechanism through which it could force a nominee to leave the race (there is some disagreement on this), but it does have procedures in its official rules outlining the party’s options in the event that its presidential or vice presidential nominee dies or voluntarily withdraws.”

“Could Rule 9 be used to remove a nominee? There are two schools of thought on this. One says no; the other says maybe. It ultimately comes down to a matter of interpretation, and what the rule actually says is less important than what a majority of the RNC’s members interpret it to say. At the center of the debate about Rule 9 are varying interpretations of the word ‘otherwise’ in the rule’s text: ‘The Republican National Committee is hereby authorized and empowered to fill any and all vacancies which may occur by reason of death, declination, or otherwise [emphasis added] of the Republican candidate for President of the United States or the Republican candidate for Vice President of the United States.’”

TL;DR: No? Maybe? Who knows? (The linked article also describes stipulations for Hillary replacement and nominee certification deadlines. I kept to the GOP (Trump-specific, even) sections because you asked about the GOP.) Since the certification deadline has passed in pretty much every state with a clearly defined deadline, I get the feeling a replacement wouldn’t happen unless there was a major emergency, like death or something.))

Thank you!