artemisdontknow liked this
letmeletsmeetlessmeat liked this
thisstupidmistake liked this
maximumsaltlevels liked this
savvybrave liked this
bisexualbuckleys liked this
d1zzygr3y liked this
life-starts-now reblogged this from thatsaces and added: Kinda relatable, gosh
life-starts-now liked this
bmmsmg reblogged this from ace-and-aro-wlw-positivity
aroneutrois said:
@fuck-it-all-to-hell Well the first one can apply to all aros. The main definition is “romantic feelings fade when reciprocated”. You can identify however you want but don’t spread it as universal when it’s not!
frick-it-all-to-hecc said:
@aroneutrois yeah, but the definition of lith/akoi is “liking the idea of a romantic relationship in theory but not in practice” and/or “having romantic feelings and losing them when reciprocated.” As an akoiromantic/lithromantic person i’ve familiarized myself with the definition and the lith/akoi community uses both
aroneutrois said:
@fuck-it-all-to-hell yeah. That’s what I said. Because there are aros who like romance & romantic gestures but that does not make them lith if they do not experience romantic attraction. And romance repulsion is another different topic
frick-it-all-to-hecc said:
@aroneutrois they develop crushes and like the idea of romance but when feelings are confessed they disappear. Lith/akoi are still arospec identities though so a lith/akoi person could ID as simply aro if they want.
aroneutrois said:
@fuck-it-all-to-hell But that’s 2 different things! Liking the idea of romantic relationship & having romantic feelings are 2 different things! One can like romance in books for example & be repulsed when someone confesses a crush. They’re still aro! Because they do not experience romantic attraction. Lith means romantic attraction fades so one must be able to feel romantic attraction first! If you don’t, you aro!